|
| Ratings and Reviews: |
| Number
of Ratings: 1 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
| 0% |
0% |
0% |
0% |
0% |
0% |
100% |
0% |
0% |
0% |
|
Weighed
Average (?):  (6/10) |
Average
Rating:  (7/10) |
| Highest
Rating: (7/10) |
| Lowest
Rating: (7/10) |
|
|
|
|
| Reviewer:
JimmyJump
(Edit) |
Rating: |
Apr 25, 2010 |
| |
Pas mal comme variation sur ce conte ancient (qui, entre parenthèses, n'est pas de Walt Disney mais probablement de James Halliwell-Phillipps, et publié en 1843 en Angleterre).
Les contes sexifié sont generalement pas mon truc, mais come divertissement furtif, c'etait OK...
JJ (7/10)
|
|
|
About 