|
| Ratings and Reviews: |
| Number
of Ratings: 4 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
| 0% |
0% |
0% |
0% |
75% |
25% |
0% |
0% |
0% |
0% |
|
Weighed
Average (?):  (5.5/10) |
| Average
Rating: (5.5/10) |
Highest
Rating:  (6/10) |
Lowest
Rating:  (5/10) |
|
|
|
|
| Reviewer:
mkemse
(Edit) |
Rating: |
Oct 24, 2007 |
| |
good to read but not much there, more dialogthen anything nothing realy erotic (6/10)
|
|
|
|
|
| Reviewer:
ladys_maid
(Edit) |
Rating: |
May 11, 2003 |
| |
Not much to add to previous reviews. Nice ideas, nice story, poor execution. (5/10)
|
|
|
|
|
| Reviewer:
Engineer
(Edit) |
Rating: |
Apr 29, 2003 |
| |
I fully agree with GdRsDiamond (5/10)
|
|
|
|
|
| Reviewer:
GdRsDiamond
(Edit) |
Rating: |
Apr 22, 2003 |
| |
The story was acctually quite good, and there were many very exciting langauge elements used. But the grammer was horrible and the pov kept shifting abruptly. One very enjoyable quality of the story was how completely believable it was.. this either did happen or could have, no element of the story was beyond the believable. (5/10)
|
|
|
About 