| 
     
   
     | 
     | 
     | 
   
   
    | 
    The Ranch
    
    Author: Max
     | 
   
   
    |   | 
    (Added on Aug 9, 2002)
            (This month 54770 readers) (Total 73598 readers) | 
   
   
    |   | 
    Another story based on author's wild experience. Read author's other stories if you like this one. | 
   
 
 
   
    | Ratings and Reviews: | 
   
   
    | Number 
      of Ratings: 2 | 
    
  | 
  | 
  | 
  | 
  | 
  | 
  | 
  | 
  | 
  | 
 
  | 
  | 
  | 
  | 
  | 
  | 
  | 
  | 
  | 
  | 
 
  | 
  | 
  | 
  | 
  | 
  | 
  | 
  | 
  | 
  | 
 
  | 
  | 
  | 
  | 
  | 
  | 
  | 
  | 
  | 
  | 
 
  | 
  | 
  | 
  | 
  | 
  | 
  | 
  | 
  | 
  | 
 
  | 
  | 
  | 
  | 
  | 
  | 
  | 
  | 
  | 
  | 
 
  | 
  | 
  | 
  | 
  | 
  | 
  | 
  | 
  | 
  | 
 
  | 
  | 
  | 
  | 
  | 
  | 
  | 
  | 
  | 
  | 
 
  | 
  | 
  | 
  | 
  | 
  | 
  | 
  | 
  | 
  | 
 
  | 
  | 
  | 
  | 
  | 
  | 
  | 
  | 
  | 
  | 
 
  | 
  | 
  | 
  | 
  | 
  | 
  | 
  | 
  | 
  | 
 
| 1 | 
2 | 
3 | 
4 | 
5 | 
6 | 
7 | 
8 | 
9 | 
10 | 
 
| 0% | 
0% | 
0% | 
50% | 
0% | 
50% | 
0% | 
0% | 
0% | 
0% | 
 
 
 | 
   
   
     Weighed
      Average (?):  (5/10) | 
   
   
    Average 
      Rating:  (5/10) | 
   
   
    Highest 
      Rating:  (6/10) | 
   
   
    Lowest 
      Rating:  (4/10) | 
   
 
 
 
   
     | 
     | 
     | 
     | 
   
   
    | Reviewer: 
    jbowler65
  (Edit)     | 
    Rating:  | 
    Feb 25, 2004 | 
   
   
    |   | 
        Prologue was a bit long, but overall it was a decent story. (6/10) 
     | 
   
 
 
   
     | 
     | 
     | 
     | 
   
   
    | Reviewer: 
    boccaccio2000g
  (Edit)     | 
    Rating:  | 
    Aug 25, 2002 | 
   
   
    |   | 
        This story seems badly mis-coded to me.  The principal character is a male submissive - which is fine, but not my cup of tea.  There is also an over-long, redundant prologue that was rather tedious to wade through (4/10) 
     | 
   
  
    |   | 
    
       
        - Replied by: 
max
  (Edit)  (Feb 25, 2004)
 
        - You are certainly correct regarding the mis-coding. 
 With respect to the Prologuge however, that is why it's a Prologue. Prologues are not required reading.  
       
     | 
   
 
 | 
     
       |